Other Solutions
Workflows4s is heavily inspired by Temporal and other similar projects, but it stands out with two primary design differences:
- No Additional Server: There’s no external component to deploy or manage. Your code and database are all you need.
- Process Diagram Rendering: Workflows4s allows you to render process diagrams directly from code.
Comparison of Related Projects
Below is a comparison of Workflows4s with other workflow orchestration tools based on whether they are self-contained, code-first, and declarative:
Project | Self-contained | Code-first | Declarative |
---|---|---|---|
Temporal & Cadence | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
Camunda | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Conductor | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Golem Cloud | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
AWS Step Functions | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
zio-flow | ❌ | ✅ | ~ |
aecor | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
endless | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
infintic | ~ | ✅ | ❌ |
Baker | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Notes:
- infintic: Requires Apache Pulsar, which can be seen as a database and is not specific to infintic.
- zio-flow: Could theoretically render diagrams, but this feature has not been implemented.
A longer list of similar tools can be found here.
Explanation of Terms
Self-contained
A solution is considered self-contained if it doesn’t require additional external servers or components. All functionality is encapsulated within your application and existing infrastructure, such as your database.
Code-first
A code-first approach means workflows are defined programmatically using standard programming constructs instead of external DSLs, GUIs, or configuration files. This approach integrates naturally with your existing codebase.
Declarative
A declarative workflow means the shape of the workflow is static and can be rendered as a diagram or model. This is different from dynamic workflows, like those in Temporal, where the structure evolves based on runtime logic defined in code.
Comparison with Airflow-like Systems
While Workflows4s shares some conceptual similarities with data orchestration tools like Apache Airflow, there are fundamental differences in design philosophy and intended use cases.
Key Differences
Aspect | Airflow-like Systems | Workflows4s |
---|---|---|
Primary Purpose | ETL and batch-oriented data workflows | Business workflows and service orchestration |
Execution Model | Schedule-based or manually triggered | Event-driven with strong state management |
State Management | Limited persistence of task status | Full event-sourced state management |
Runtime Duration | Optimized for short-lived tasks with timeouts | Supports long-running workflows with indefinite pauses |
Service Orchestration | Limited support for distributed transactions | Built for service orchestration with event-driven architecture |
Human Interaction | Limited native support for human tasks | Can incorporate human approval steps through signals |
Deployment Model | Separate orchestration server | Self-contained within your application |
Workflows4s is designed to integrate directly with your application code, providing workflow capabilities without the operational overhead of standalone orchestration systems.